Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jerry McAbee's avatar

The horror that Stand-in Forces (SIF), isolated and unsupported on remote islands, will have inadequate on-scene medical and casualty evacuation support should not come as a surprise to anyone. Like the rest of Force Design 2030, the SIF concept was never vetted through the Combat Development Process. Had the SIF concept been properly vetted, it would have been exposed for what it is - - a fool’s errand. The entire area of logistics (medical, food and water, maintenance, transportation, etc.), survivability, positioning and repositioning, and even the effectiveness of the anti-ship missiles have never been sufficiently addressed, much less resolved. In the mad rush to appear revolutionary, the Marine Corps put empty words ahead of the mission and the welfare of the Marines needed to accomplish it. The entire SIF concept needs to be scrapped before Marines, isolated and unsupported on remote islands, are needlessly killed and maimed.

Expand full comment
Douglas C Rapé's avatar

I recently had an email exchange with an individual I do not know who has his own Substack Account. ( Amphibiosity) It appears that he is a Marine Colonel in the USMCR and currently a civilian employee in Quantico. He has actively defended FD-20XX. In one exchange he claimed that the Chinese cannot deploy forces to threaten the missile batteries and that the “near by” MAGTF can support them. Imagine my surprise….. he also opined that the terms winning or losing have no meaning as the objective is to create a political situation in our favor. I will not engage any further because I simply lack the intellectual depth to understand what he is talking about. I relate this exchange for a simple reason. Try as I might, I simply cannot understand the viability of the concept. It is a concept that has no flesh and blood component.

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts