Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bob Whitener's avatar

Embedded in MAGTF combined arms and Warfighting is the intangible quality of ingenuity. Reading about then Col. O. P. Smith, the new 5th Marines CO in 1943, he was tasked with an amphibious assault that would have to be accomplished without the benefit of naval gunfire support. The solution was to place 5 Sherman tanks in LCMs. Tank fire support was used instead of naval gunfire. Where there is a will, there is a way. The promised air support didnt show either but the 5th Marines prevailed. Marines must be able to function in an imperfect world. SF

Expand full comment
Alfred Karam's avatar

I read an article (link below) that state the US Air Force, conducting a demonstration bomb drop from a B-52, that sank the USS Tarawa with a “Quicksink” bomb. This demonstration was part of Rimpac war drill.

Here again, our sister services have the technology and know how to sink aircraft carriers with one cheap bomb at their disposal, why would the Marine Corps have a need to continue to pursue FD that is focused on access denial targeting the People’s Liberation Army Navy? Get back to maneuver warfare. Get away from the littoral regiments design. Get back to the MAGTF concept that is proven and is still very much in need for our combatant commanders who are dealing with multitudes of serious geopolitical issues around the world.

The Marine Corps leadership must refocus on the MAGTF concept and retool as fast as possible. Leave the sinking and sea lanes denial to our sister services…don’t duplicate the effort!

https://www.wionews.com/world/china-alarmed-as-us-tests-quicksink-bomb-to-rein-in-bellicose-pla-navy-745708

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts