Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Cpl Dan USMC (Ret)'s avatar

Spot on—fleet ops are the Corps’ soul, and FD2030’s MLR obsession’s bleeding it dry. E=MC² proves it: mass and speed win. Desert Storm’s MAGTFs—88,000 Marines, 144 ships—crushed Saddam in 100 hours. Today’s MLRs? 1,800 bodies, no tanks, no amphibs to move ‘em. Haiti 2010 showed MAGTF’s magic—III MEF hit fast, global, no politics. Now we’ve got zero afloat MAGTFs in the Med or Red Sea, and MPS ships are rusting relics—14 left, down from 33. China’s not the only game; Iran, Russia, Africa don’t care about our Pacific fetish. Scrap this MLR nonsense, rebuild the MAGTF—24 battalions, tanks, amphibs—and keep the fleet rolling. Time’s ticking, and romance won’t save us when the next 9/11 drops.

Semper Fi

Expand full comment
Douglas C Rapé's avatar

There is a common denominator here. It is a gross lack of integrity for the sake of toxic ambition. To put ships into the category of “temporarily not available” when they are simply unable to get underway in years is lawyer speak and a technicality over morality. Leadership and integrity failures at every level.

The mixing of fuel and sparks is an ongoing farce that has been lied about for decades. Once again integrity would demand truth. Integrity is a rare bird. You can slice and dice this any way you want from “ in the chain of command” to “not really an issue”. Yet, there it is. Undeniable. The proof is revealed daily and denied daily. With a heterosexual and now homosexual environment there is only one draconian solution. Currently DoD is the most LGBTQI, mommy friendly, hook up friendly institution on earth making a college campus or corporations look monastic in comparison. To make matters worse the anointed contend that Jane has the athletic and fighting prowess of Tarzan.

The industrial base to build warships of high quality, quickly simply must be rebuilt as fast as possible. National survival depends on it. In the interim we must buy ships from foreign shipyards as fast as possible and finish them out with the classified portions in the US rapidly. Currently our undersized, over committed, marginally trained Navy cannot control the global SLOC’s. The Marine Corps portion of that mission self cancelled.

Women and homosexuals are a part of the personnel and manning paradigm. That is irreversible and will remain problematic. Three things are policy related and can be adjusted to accommodate reality:

1. The assignment of occupational specialties must realistically be applied to the norms of genders not the 1% outliers. The rejection of this reality will be paid in blood. Integrity in this regard has been absent. If flying a fighter jet requires 20/20 vision, an infantryman must be able to throw hand grenades beyond their bursting radius and prevail in a bayonet fight.

2. Pregnant women, for the sake of the child, mother and the unit must be transferred out of units with a 18 month leave of absence after the first trimester to accommodate birth, bonding and reconditioning for return to active service. Details on pay, benefits, date of rank, obligated service etc TBD.

3. The services must adopt a strict non fraternization policy that forbids any intimate contact between service members regardless of rank, gender, billet or chain of command. No dating, no marriage, no intimacy, no casual physical relationships. This will put a large dent into favoritism, conflict of interest, adverse impacts on unit synergy, sexual harassment, sexual assault and the drama associated with relationship failures. It will not stop the human attraction paradigm of the species but it will reduce it to very clearly defined and understandable parameters. Punishment must be handed out to both parties and the harshest to the most senior. This will take a rewriting of the UCMJ and an acknowledgement that military service is like no other in a modern, liberal society. Of course, love and war are like no other human endeavors and they do not mix well.

Our nation is in a perilous situation. Our global defense needs cannot be met with the force we have. Too small, too poorly trained, too lacking in focus and naively, blissfully unaware on all three counts. We are unprepared for an extended conventional conflict with peers and non peer adversaries let alone a combination of them.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts