Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Douglas C Rapé's avatar

Frank and open discourse requires a lot of work and a lot of thought. It is so much easier to crush those asking tough questions and marginalize them as “ resistant to change” and implement in the dead of night. This crosses every realm of an organization from weapons to tactics, training, manpower policies, ethos and the soul of the institution. The best leaders manage this process through leadership, intellect and charismatic personalities. The worst resort to draconian measures, secrecy and loyalty checks. It is no surprise that “careers” are impacted and moral cowardice in protecting or destroying careers is a major handicap to institutional excellence. The Berger/Smith era would not have been possible with the erosions of the 30 years before it.

The pros and cons of FD 2030 aside, the very process or lack thereof exposed an institutional ethos that had been radically transformed by careerism, political correctness, cultural compromises and a vast profusion of specialized MOS’s and decades of insurgencies which served to pull the focus from traditional and more timeless Marine missions. Today the Corps has painted itself into a small corner that will make it irrelevant. It did not happen overnight.

Expand full comment
Jerry McAbee's avatar

Neither the 2018 NDAA nor the 2022 NDAA nor Congress directed the Marine in Corps to radically restructure and reorganize to confront the PLAN. Force Design and the destruction of the combined arms, expeditionary force-in-readiness are self inflicted. There is no one to blame but the 38th and 39th Commandants.

Expand full comment
22 more comments...

No posts