Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jerry McAbee's avatar

Divest to invest is a “witches brew.” It is a failed approach to transforming a military force for the future. Don’t take my word for it. Consider the following:

1. A May 2025 article in Military Times titled “Ill-fated Gaza pier mission lacked sufficient training, equipment: IG.” According to the article, the DoD IG report cited numerous reasons the Gaza Pier was essentially a failed mission. One of the reasons was the divestment of needed equipment, i.e. “Between 2018 and 2023, the Army and Navy had completed major divestments of equipment the JLOTS system required… including roughly half the Army’s watercraft, or 64 out of 134, [and] one of the Navy’s two JLOTS-capable unites, Amphibious Construction Battalion 2.” To read the full article, refer to: https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2025/05/06/ill-fated-gaza-pier-mission-lacked-sufficient-training-equipment-ig/

2. In his April 2025 Posture Statement, Admiral Samuel Paparo (Commander, U.S. Indo-Pacific Command) stated: “To enable effective, all domain fires across the vast Pacific theater, USINDOPACOM must implement a comprehensive modernization strategy that adheres to the “make-before-break” principle. This means that combat-relevant capabilities should not be divested until their replacements are ready. To read the full statement, refer to: https://armedservices.house.gov/uploadedfiles/indopacom_posture_statement_2025.pdf

3. In a November 2022 article in Defense News titled “US Air Forces ‘divest to invest’ plan is too risky, General John Loh, USAF (ret) and former Vice COS of the Air Force provided a multitude of reasons why the "divest to invest" approach to modernization is a recipe for disaster. His summary could not be more clear: “’Divest to invest’ may have been a workable strategy years ago when global threats were less severe. Today, however, divesting now in the hope of recapitalizing years later is too risky and can invite attacks by adversaries in the interval when our forces are weaker.” To read the full article, refer to: https://www.defensenews.com/opinion/commentary/2022/11/16/us-air-forces-divest-to-invest-plan-is-too-risky/

The underpinning of Force Design was “divest to invest.” You can judge for yourself if this was a prudent action or not.

Expand full comment
cfrog's avatar

I was watching them fly around New Bern on a sunny day about two months ago. I am glad I got that last chance. The pilots and maintainers for the AV-8B were a unique (in a very good way) crew. I am sure as much as the airplane was loved, it is nice to put the headaches to rest. Still bittersweet when we say goodbye to these teams of Marines and machines after such good and faithful service. I had the good fortune, on my very first CASEX, to be able to call in the last A-4s in the Pacific. I remember seeing the last RF-4s at Kadena (air show). And I'll never forget when an SR71 (obviously not a Marine bird) flew over Schwab on final shortly before they retired. Even the UAVs; got to see a Pioneer on the Missouri when she came through Subic in '90. Years later, I thought someone ND'd a TOW when a Pioneer did it's little rocket launch thing in Diwaniyah next to our pos. All good. Time moves on; I just get younger and better looking.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts