Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Douglas C Rapé's avatar

Under General Berger’s secretive guidance the Corps divested itself to irrelevance. It is a large force of 160,000 that cannot contribute in any relationship to its size. Its current, self delineated mission hardly warrants 15,000 Marines let alone 160,000. Congress will soon realize this and the Army, Navy and Air Force will gladly point it out. Their recruiting shortfalls will benefit from 145,000 Marines made available at the garage sale of people and equipment.

The nation’s inability to intervene will be an isolationist’s dream. To the liberal culture warriors the dissolution of the most traditional and Spartan military service is an unanticipated but welcome benefit.

As soon as the Maginot Line in the South China Sea is rendered obsolete the need for any USMC of any sort becomes clear. Probably a ceremonial squadron of about 1000 Marines as a Navy MOS. The Drum and Bugle Corps, Drill Team, Marine Band, White House support detachment and some Presidential umbrella holders.

Expand full comment
Charles Wemyss, Jr.'s avatar

The Marine Corps is and has been a pebble in the shoe of all five sides of the puzzle palace for decades and before that the war department and members of Congress and before that circa 1775 anyone who wanted to be a Marine and either didn’t or couldn’t. The last thing the transformational society of “elites” in Foggy Bottom want is a small seaborne force capable of short, mid and long term military and or humanitarian operations. General Berger and for that matter General Smith can paint it any way they want but they attempted and hopefully have failed to reduce the Corps to irrelevance. The open question is did they do enough to succeed. The larger question is what had prompted this dissolution effort. Not sure how it is today, but back 40 years ago there was a box that got checked by the reviewing officer on one’s fitness report. An officer could be marginal in many areas but the ONE box you wanted checked is “would serve with in combat”. If that box was a negative it was a show stopper. Something or someone had gone horribly wrong or bad. We all served with a couple of officers that we did not trust and did not like and did want to be in the TOAR with them. Sadly not knowing Berger or Smith, but knowing they came behind me, it is hard to imagine that they did not already smell badly. We know them when we see them. Equally we know the guys that without equivocation we would lay down our lives for if it came to it. It would be simple muscle memory and the pathological optimism in our personalities that would say “Hell we are both or all going to get out of this mess.” Then out to face whatever it was that trying to do us harm.

The next question is can we save enough of the blue water navy to get back out to sea and can we convince enough politicians that while they might not like us, America and Americans have spoken through the years, “Representative Pinhead, we may not need a Marine Corps but we want one.” Besides who will guard the gates of Heaven if not us. Exactly it’s a short list with one name, United States Marines…

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts