Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeffrey Dinsmore's avatar

I'm afraid they're going to have to learn the hard way. Think about current conditions and mindsets, which are prevalent in the active duty force today:

-Marines who enlisted or accessed in 2001 are approaching 22 years in service

-These Marines are Staff NCOs and Field Grade Officers who have never known warfare pre-2001.

-These Marines have only known slow-moving, certain, violence-minimized warfare that values persistent ISR, precision, and the immediate gratification of a kill in support of CT/COIN.

-These Marines have not been encouraged to study history; these Marines have been primed to read "Ghost Fleet" and "The Kill Chain."

-These Marines truly believe, based on their experience and their PME value system, that the past way of warfare is passé. Violence, Friction, and Uncertainty, while described by Clausewitz as the Nature of War, have been eliminated by Progress. The future way of war will be different than all of human history.

Today's senior leaders are complicit in this mindset, as they've been dazzled by defense contractors advertising the latest technology, pressured by political fads, and have abandoned their philosophical groundings.

This is the future, and they will only learn the hard way.

Expand full comment
Douglas C Rapé's avatar

The Corps went from 27 Infantry Bns to 21. The Bn’s over time went from 1100 plus to the current number of about 800 with additions of all sorts of additional Marines while shrinking the squads to 11. All of this is justified by fantasies and supposed greater situational awareness and “increased firepower”. Where is this firepower? Additionally these BNs will not have tube artillery in support. In the defense, what does the FLOT look like. To those who claim it can maneuver better I would ask how does it March faster? A rendezvous with reality is coming. It will not be pretty.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts