Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lynn Stuart's avatar

Lynn Stuart

The analogy of the world’s precious Antimony with the diminishing role of the MAGTF and its impact on our national defense couldn’t be more explicit.

Why does the active leadership in our Corps continue to ascribe to the Force 2030 philosophy and courses of action that defy logic and common sense? The Marine Corps has been relegated to a menial role in the overall military defense scheme, not only incapable of performing its traditional Title X responsibilities, but unable to maintain a consistent MEU presence in most troubled spots of the world.

Other than Compass Points, where is the dialogue, debate, discussion, or arguments (by our Marine leadership) for or against Force 2030? I don’t see it in Leatherneck or any other military journals! Why is this discourse suppressed or obviated at a time when the Corp’s combat capabilities have been significantly depleted and/or divested? To what end? Seven cannon batteries for an entire U.S Marine Corps? Really!! No Tanks, virtually no Combat Engineering, no MP’s, 1/3 reduction in Assault Amphibs, and over 20% reduction in Infantry??? And more! What have we done to our national defense?

Rescuing the Marine Corps from its dwindling self must start within — with its senior leadership acknowledging its diminished abilities and willing to restore both logic and common sense that has been a casualty of Force 2030. That same venue should also open a dialogue among all to support/defend it or lay out a course for a new direction for the Corps. Simultaneously, our leadership should join others (lawmakers and friends of Marines) to take certain initiatives to restore, upgrade, and expand the Marine Corps’s global, combined arms, crisis response MAGTFs. Our US National Defense depends upon it! The U.S. Marine Corps future depends upon it! Semper Fi!

Expand full comment
Douglas C Rapé's avatar

There are three issues in play here:

1. What people say is immaterial. What people do is the best indicator of true intent.

2. National Defense is so much more than the Department of Defense. It is a national issue that criss crosses everything we do. Education is national defense. 300,000 Chinese students at US Universities is a defense issue. Petro Chemical, Agriculture, industrial base, infra structure, youth physical fitness, high tech industry, critical minerals and chemicals, export policy, research, development and acquisition, cultural standards, immigration, national health, strategic stockpiles, transportation, diplomacy, entertainment, sports, commercial shipping and aviation policy are all defense related. Who coordinates and directs these efforts? Something as simple as stockpiling critical minerals seem to be too hard to grasp. We can’t even refill the National Petroleum Stockpile or build up critical medical resources.

3. Our Corps, seeking to be cutting edge and lethal engaged in a series of miscalculations that made it virtually irrelevant. Change is certain. The right change is another matter. While history champions change that ushered in victory the failures of change are relegated to the dusty back shelves. When change agents dismiss their critics as “resistant to change” you know they cannot debate the merits of the change they champion. So it was the day FD-20XX was spawned in secrecy with threats and subterfuge. The very process of implementation was an indicator as to its value. It could not stand up to the scrutiny of professional analysis. It could not stand up to scrutiny and leaned on trying to discredit the well meaning and experienced like Gen Gray and countless professional SNCOs, Officers and Generals.

Today we are facing a narrow window to rebuild, reform and once again make the Marine Corps a globally relevant MAGTF. Failure to do so will result in a catastrophic impact with Congressional funding priorities and extinction.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts