Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Douglas C Rapé's avatar

The points made about foreign building of US Warships to surge our ability to grow the Navy are valid and have been made repeatedly. We simply must stop procrastinating.

No need to beat the dead horse of an irrelevant Marine Corps.

Expand full comment
Samuel Whittemore's avatar

Next I ask about Allies building better Amphibious Ships quicker:Yes, shipyards in the Republic of Korea (ROK), Japan, and other allies could potentially build amphibious ships faster and, in some cases, better than current U.S. capabilities, due to their advanced industrial bases, efficiency, and cost advantages. Here’s why:

ROK shipyards, like HD Hyundai Heavy Industries and Hanwha Ocean, dominate global shipbuilding, producing 30% of the world’s ships. They excel in rapid, high-quality construction—Ulsan’s yard churns out 40-50 vessels annually, including warships, using modular techniques that cut build times. Japan, with Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, follows at 17%, building advanced Aegis-equipped destroyers like the Maya-class in about 3-4 years, compared to 6-7 years for similar U.S. ships like the Arleigh Burke-class. Both nations leverage modern automation, skilled labor, and integrated steel production, keeping costs low—ROK builds frigates for $500 million versus $2.5 billion for U.S. equivalents.

U.S. shipyards, like Ingalls and Bath Iron Works, face delays from aging infrastructure, labor shortages, and less efficient processes. The Constellation-class frigate, for example, is already over budget at $1.2 billion per ship and years behind schedule. ROK and Japan’s yards, by contrast, have order books full through 2029, reflecting reliability and speed.

Other allies, like Italy’s Fincantieri (building U.S. frigates) or Australia’s Austal, also show promise. Italy delivered FREMM frigates in 5 years, faster than U.S. timelines. However, ROK and Japan stand out for scale and naval expertise. Their ships often match or exceed U.S. quality—ROK’s Sejong-class destroyers and Japan’s Izumo-class carriers boast cutting-edge tech.

The catch? U.S. laws like the Jones Act and security concerns limit outsourcing. Still, allies could fill gaps, especially for amphibious ships, if legal and political hurdles are cleared. Their track record suggests faster, cheaper, and at least as good.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts