Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Douglas C Rapé's avatar

Never, never, never give up an airfield. A nation with global responsibilities must have a global web of mutually supporting air fields each within range of three to four other airfields. Add 12-16 mobile ones ( Aircraft carriers). Not every, and perhaps most do not need permanently assigned aircraft. Even better if these airfields can co-locate with ports. These are the strategic lily pads that make positioning, staging, repositioning, deploying and evacuating possible. It is the strategic flexibility that allows you to mass or disburse as circumstances dictate. It forces your enemies to consider far more scenarios and potential threats. You can stage fuel, supplies and ammunition, billeting and medical facilities. While installations, even manned with minimal personnel are not inexpensive they are cheap compared to the alternatives and the lack of options. This is global, maneuver warfare at the installation level.

Since the fall of the Soviet Union we engaged in an ill advised , massive draw down of facilities both in CONUS and overseas with the further mirage of cost savings by creating mega bases in violation of all principles of distributing valuable resources from sabotage, terrorism, conventional and unconventional attacks. Most of this occurred with highly questionable claims of cost savings and virtually no consideration for actual war time considerations.

Expand full comment
Randy Shetter's avatar

I hope we don't garrison the island with the SIF!

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts