Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Douglas C Rapé's avatar

The idea to purchase foreign ships either complete on in some specific stage of development is not new. The divestiture of ships over the last 55 years has been nothing short of criminal.

A 30 year plan is obscene. “ Over the bleached and jumbled bones of destroyed civilizations are written the pathetic words: too late, too late.” I cannot recall the author. We simply do not have 30 years. The OODA loop applies.

Corporal Grable's avatar

In other news:

The 12 May 2026 House Appropriations Defense Subcommittee hearing on the Navy and Marine Corps budget offered a clear picture of where things actually stand on Force Design.

Rather than criticism or retreat, the hearing showed continued alignment between the Marine Corps, Congress, Combatant Commanders, and the Administration.

Key takeaways:

• Full Budget Alignment: Gen. Smith reported that the Marine Corps submitted no Unfunded Priority List items, stating plainly that if the submitted budget is approved, the Corps’ requirements are addressed. That is a remarkable statement from a Service Chief and a strong indicator of institutional alignment and support.

• Force Design Capabilities Are Advancing: Gen. Smith highlighted the Corps’ drone task force (led by Col. Scotty Cuomo) rapidly fielding low-cost, 3D-printable systems informed by real-world lessons. On NMESIS and ROGUE Fires, he noted the software and autonomous capability are “rock solid” — the limiting factor now is missile depth, not concept viability.

• Balance, Not Trade-off: The hearing repeatedly reinforced that the Corps is restoring amphibious readiness and ARG/MEU presence while modernizing for the pacing threat. Acting SECNAV Hung Cao and multiple members highlighted ongoing SOUTHCOM operations and global crisis response requirements alongside distributed maritime capabilities.

• Institutional Credibility: Members from both parties highlighted the Marine Corps’ three consecutive clean audits — unmatched in the Department — as evidence of responsible stewardship while pursuing modernization and transformation.

This was not the hearing of a Corps in retreat or abandoning Force Design. It was the hearing of a Service refining, resourcing, and operationalizing its modernization path while sustaining its traditional role as the Nation’s expeditionary force-in-readiness.

The direction remains clear: both crisis response and high-end warfighting capability — integrated, balanced, and resourced. Congress and the Administration continue to support that approach.

Full hearing:

https://appropriations.house.gov/schedule/hearings/budget-hearing-united-states-navy-and-marine-corps

5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?