Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jack Sotallaro's avatar

I agree with Colonel Anderson and Master Guns Karam. I cannot understand how anyone can come up through the officer ranks as a Marine, and after twenty or more years wearing the EGA decide the Corps should emulate the island watchers from WWII rather than the fighting Corps we've always been. If Generals Berger and Smith think FD is the way the Corps should go, General Smith needs to be replaced and both he and General Berger should be ignored. Do officers hold blanket parties? Just asking for Uncle Sam's Misguided Children, of whom I am one.

Alfred Karam's avatar

As a retired Master Gunnery Sergeant with 25 years in the Corps, I stand with Colonel Gary Anderson 100%. Force Design 2030 was a mistake from day one. We gutted proven combined arms, artillery, armor, infantry mass, engineers, and logistics, to chase a half-baked SIF/MLR concept that’s still not ready after seven years.

NMESIS is short-ranged and already borderline obsolete. Logistics (the most important piece in this entire puzzle) for rearming in the First Island Chain? Still unsolved. If China hits Taiwan soon, our Marines will be detected, hit with overwhelming firepower, and used as sacrificial lambs.

We built the MAGTF over decades. It took just a few years to tear it down. The right move was always to ADD modern fires to the full combined arms force, not divest to invest. Restore the Corps to pre-Force Design levels, grow us to 180,000 Marines, and give our warriors what they need to win.

Otherwise, and I don’t say this lightly, we might as well roll up the flag and fold into the Army.

18 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?