Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Polarbear's avatar

Simple

Someone once said: “there is always a well-known and simple solution to every problem; neat, plausible and wrong!”

A Ukraine solution ain”t going to be simple. No amount of artillery shells is going to end the war. A World War 1 French general, when asked what would end the war, stated “Shells, Shells, and more Shells!”, and that answer didn’t work. What is the difference in trench warfare in WW1 France and the trenches in Ukraine?

The simplistic move of a JLOTS pier for Gaza is not going to help without a distribution system inside Gaza (and not controlled by Hamas). Hamas is already dropping mortar rounds on the Gaza reception area. Well someone at the US State Department please take a look at the 1992 Restore Hope Operation in Somalia.

I have said this before; US senior military leadership is responsible to explain to our political leaders that a rigorous war, makes for a short war, and a short war is a merciful war. If they could get that idea across to our politician’s maybe, just maybe, the US would stop losing forever wars strategically with our warriors bleeding to win them tactically. Especially, when strategy trumps tactics every time. Committing our warriors to a conflict must be for decisive results. Our warriors don’t sacrifice their lives, they have to be taken by an enemy. For that reason alone military leaders need to be held accountable.

Semper Fi

Expand full comment
Samuel Whittemore's avatar

Correction second sentence should have read “is failing because economic ..and.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts