Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jerry McAbee's avatar

The original Force Design documents mandated a divestment of 200 aircraft and associated force structure in the active force or about 30% of the inventory. Fifty-four of these aircraft were the F-35B. In the past year, the Marines have added back a HMH squadron and a HMLA squadron or 43 aircraft. Additional aircraft may still be added back, including some F-35B. We will know for sure when the Marines publish their 2025 Aviation Plan next month. It's good to see aircraft being added back, but it begs the question why so many aircraft were initially divested. The answer is simple: Force Design was never properly vetted through the Combat Development Process. None of the divestments (aviation, ground or CSS) were properly considered. The divestments were one of the biggest mistakes in the history of the Marine Corps; yet, the senior leadership continues to defend them. Go figure!

Expand full comment
cfrog's avatar

Interesting post; agree with the need for more birds and support for the birds. One very interesting note up front; I did not realize the USMC had been plus'd up with F35C (carrier variant - looks cool with the big wings). I thought the USMC had only gotten the Bravo. I think having the 'C is a good thing...in terms of total numbers and Marine capability. This is a rare pearl in the pig...stuff.

Also of note: reading through the original report, it looks like 'mission capable' rates have been low for the 4th gen fighters as well (https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-25-107870.pdf). Why are we always relearning that managing maintenance is a key task? There is a reason Sammy Hagar featured Paolo the Ferrari Mechanic in the video for 'I Can't Drive 55'. Hagar didn't want a display-only model and neither should the USMC. God Bless the Marines in the Squadrons working miracles to get the birds in the air.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts