Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Douglas C Rapé's avatar

The 30 month snapshot of history is a superb example of USMC versatility. Not one of these operations had been predicted six months before they occurred and some “popped up” in days. This is what a force in readiness does. Gen Berger unilaterally and secretly decided these capabilities were no longer required. He did not just decide he needed a new capability but destroyed all others in favor of a response that might never be called on and if called could not execute. That is amazing in and of itself. That it was not summarily dismissed and reversed within days is incomprehensible. That it continues to limp along without a chance of being funded on the weaponry being developed. Real world combat developments over the last two years have demonstrated that virtually every founding concept of FD-2030 is bankrupt. The current CMC has not been filling the requirements of his billet for four months without some transparency one questions if he is even capable of managing the stresses of the billet. At some point the red lights and alarms must go off.

Expand full comment
Raymond Lee Maloy's avatar

People like General Berger have become enamored with special operations because that is all they know and those operations require limited weaponry and are easy to plan and execute. Their experience, education and mindset has become warped by long periods fighting people with limited resources and ability.

Combined operations require dedication and knowledge of weapons, logistics, planning, communications and tactics. Training has to be continuous, under adverse conditions and terrain. Infantry officers who cannot integrate and employ every weapon in the inventory and communicate that knowledge to their troops are unprofessional and useless. They are not Marines. Semper Fi

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts