Discussion about this post

User's avatar
cfrog's avatar

I am very glad to hear the USMC saying it needs to address the same practical logistics issues brought up here on CP and elsewhere over the last 2 years, as seen in this comment from one of the articles in this post:

"["]Project Eagle will be heavily shaped by the concept of distributed aviation operations["], said Col. Derek Brannon, director of the Cunningham Group within the Deputy Commandant for Aviation."..."What distributed aviation operations drives us to, is looking at the hard questions of logistics, sustainment, resiliency, force protection.""..."Addressing the aviation role in contested logistics is critical, he said. And that's what DAO is driving us to do is to have those hard conversations about how are you going to actually sustain and execute anywhere around the world support the [MAGTF] and pull in the Joint Force and support the Joint Force?"".

(From https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2024/5/1/marine-corps-charting-aviation-path-to-2040. *Note: apologies for my edits in brackets; the source had grammar issues.)

-My $.02: I am a true advocate of the mantra that 'Ops Drives Logistics'...but logistical considerations are necessary to successful Operations. It is a fine line between "a great and difficult challenge, possibly without precedent" versus "cannot be done with current level of human achievement in the time frame required". I hope my friends on the "Proponent of FD (2030)" side of the house feel free to post of how blind and stuck in the past the USMC must be to admit an operational logistics deficiency in such practical matters despite being vetted in 'The Wargamingz'. Ian, Phil, Hammes, Dean, etc: Are you out there? (Preemptive note: Use of 'Campaign of Learning' is not allowed since we are speaking to Operational Capabilities available to COCOMs now. Otherwise, I could use 'Campaign of Learning' in 1863 to explain how I will eventually provide Carrier Borne Naval Air Forces to the Union Effort if we only divest of our current wooden hull vessels by the start of FY1865).

Expand full comment
Samuel Whittemore's avatar

Regarding 30 mile range for V-22, once again the Republic was lied to by its Senior Civilian and Uniformed Military Leaders. Recently a photo of Marines from the 15TH MEU, who were stranded ashore while the Broken Boxer was awaiting rudder repair, portrayed Marines practicing ingress and egress from a static V22 positioned inside a circle drawn on the airfield. This is the 2024 version of Pre WWII US Forces training w non firing rifles made of wood. No worries next month is Military Gay Pride Month…the USAF Director of DEI has made funds available for celebration of deviant sex acts for all USAF bases.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts