Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeffrey Dinsmore's avatar

I hesitate to co-opt LtGen Smith's comments wholesale in support of the issue at hand, but they are hard to dismiss as accidental critiques of the Corps' initiatives.

First: He pointedly quotes Gen Wilhelm as a voice from the past, one of the giants of the Corps upon whose shoulders we stand, as he defines the nature of an expeditionary Marine.

He outlines the value proposition that each element of the MAGTF brings to the fight. Personally poignant is his description of 7th Marines, led by Col Dave Hart, conducting a series of dismounted attacks over 40km, defeating an enemy in detail in force on force exercises of last year. I was a staff member of 1st MarDiv and witness to this feat. LtGen Smith understates the nature of the fight. It was one between Marines of mettle and grit vs. experimental units with sensors, mobility, and all the promise of an FD2030 unit. The results were devastating for anyone who disbelieves the immutable nature of war.

Finally, he reinforces the nature of "talent leadership" vs. "Talent Management." Identification and retention of individual Marines with superior skillsets is the business of the commander with most direct contact with those Marines. It is not the business of the institution, which cannot and should not institute impersonal policies that value technicians over the Marines that will walk and assault over 40km to victory.

He said he might receive a phone call as a result of that speech or some of its contents. I trust that he, as a Warfighter, has counted the cost.

No matter the result, this speech is worthy of archive alongside the oral histories of our previous Generals, as a seminal moment in the debate and discourse over FD2030.

Expand full comment
Alfred Karam's avatar

It’s very refreshing to hear of active duty senior officers speaking out knowing that they are cutting across the grain...LtGen Smith has my utmost respect!

Expand full comment

No posts