Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bob Whitener's avatar

COMMENT (1) MV-22:

The MV-22 fix remains a mystery. Does the cockpit figuration have any influence on the clutch engagement that sometimes fails catastrophically and kills aircrew? Does the cockpit have a fixed wing configuration or is it a helicopter configuration? If the cockpit configuration is a fixed wing configuration there may be a problem.

As to the the MV-22 safety record, are apples and oranges being mixed as one? Broadly, there are two general causes of aircraft accidents; (1) pilot error and (2) equipment failure. It appears most of the MV-22 accidents were caused by a mysterious, clutch engagement failure; equipment failure. The MV-22 safety record was compared recently to the early CH-46 D safety record.

In 1970, as a new member of HMM-365 at MAG-26, we were transitioning from the UH-34D to the new CH-46D. We flew our new aircraft direct from the Philadelphia factory to MACF New River. Some time later the CH-46D aft transmission failures began. These failures turned the CH-46D into a flying midair. Analysis of the issue revealed the more powerful CH-46D engines, and the rigors of operational flying, placed torque on the airframes that would cause the transmission to fail. The airframe was strengthened. The failures ended. The CH-46D had a long service life.

The point is, the cause of the CH-46D transmissions failures, that initially led to a horrendous accident rate, was determined and fixed. This is not the case with the MV-22. Its accident rate should not be compared with other aircraft, such as the CH-46D, until the cause of the failures are determined and fixed.

COMMENT (2): Reactivate HMLA-269

LT Gen Wise did not have a Marine Corps Aviation Plan published for two years. He then published a plan that clearly stated the divestment of squadrons at MAG-26 and MAG-29 would place remaining squadrons with unsustainable capability to meet known commitments. The plan was published and he retired.

As the former CO of HMA-269 that transitioned to become HMLA-269, the deactivation was a bitter pill to swallow. The deactivation was much more than moth balling airframes. The loss of generations of highly skilled, aviation maintenance Marines was the most serious loss.

Also, in my opinion it caused a built in aviation safety hazard. The remaining Marines, being Marines, would move mountains to meet any commitments, even though their senior leaders had knowingly over committed them. Knowingly making Marines fail................

Expand full comment
Douglas C Rapé's avatar

There is a common denominator across the four examples. It is “ gross lack of integrity”. The senior leadership of the institution is simply incapable of transparency or truth. It keeps getting worse. “Oh what tangled webs we weave when we first decide to deceive.” Too many of the Corps leaders surround themselves with a body guard of lies to borrow a phrase. This will impact the Corps like acid on metal.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts