Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jerry McAbee's avatar

Facts are stubborn things. The 38th Commandant radically reorganized and restructured the Marine Corps from an expeditionary global force in readiness to a toothless regional force in waiting. His ACMC was the biggest cheerleader for the changes. The 39th Commandant doubled-down on the madness. The record is indisputable. Read the 38th and 39th Commandants Planning Guidance, Force Design 2030 and the Force Design 2030 Annual Update of 2022, and the Concept for Stand-in Forces. Today's Corps has no operationally capable MLRs; no armor; no bridging; no instride breaching; no resiliency in infantry, aviation, or amphibious assault vehicles; insufficient cannon artillery and expeditionary logistics; and is inadequately supported by amphibious and maritime prepositioning ships. These are the facts.

Expand full comment
Bud Meador's avatar

I am concerned with the chatter of firing the CMC. Accountability has the support of us all, I’m sure. But, before we seriously speak of firing our CMC, we probably should have a “come to Jesus meeting” with ourselves, and ask uncomfortable questions regarding the “multitude of sins” that have landed us where we are today. The lack of Amphibs -just in numbers alone, much less needed upgrades - did not come about with the ascent of the General Berger tenure. We might recall the last time the Naval Service embarked a Marine Division was “Operation Steel Pike” in 1965. We have argued for adequate numbers of Amphibs for decades: deaf ears in terms of results. Of course, we deal in new and deadly technologies … but, so did our dad’s and grandpa’s in the 1940’s … anyone recall “Advance Force Operations”? Does the reduced state of Amphibious capability really rest on the shoulders of any one CMC when those who can make a decisive difference wears another uniform, or, a civilian coat & tie? I refer here to any number of SecDef’s, SecNav’s, any number of Senators & Rep’s who could have made a difference, perhaps DOS Statesmen who should know of our numerous NEO’s over the years, and leading

Academic & Intellectuals. So, it seems to me our current status has many fathers rather than a single CMC. If, after due consideration by wiser heads than mine, it is deemed appropriate to move on our CMC, so be it. But, we need to remember our plight has been brought on a multitude of players, and over a very long period of time. The foregoing is offered as food for thought. Semper Fidelis!

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts