Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeffrey Dinsmore's avatar

When studying the current state of affairs, one can't help but document the past mistakes that led to it.

In 2007, my brother (a SSgt) and I (a young Capt) were sitting in a Fallujah chow hall. We were discussing the interesting initiatives we had seen coming out of Quantico. Weird uniform regs, rent-a-cops at the base gates, and other changes in policy that seemed detached from our ethos and common sense. For example, HQMC had just announced that units were to refrain from conducting weekly field days and barracks inspections, on the premise that our Marines were combat veterans and should be allowed to live as adults without intrusive leadership. We were perplexed as we discussed these changes in the rear.

Then it struck me. "This is the plot of Risky Business, the Tom Cruise movie!" "The adults have left town and are all in Iraq, and the kids are back CONUS selling all the furniture and getting ripped off by hookers!

We laughed then, and we still do about that memory, although the crisis is no laughing matter now. There are plenty of bad decisions along the way...like using the war money from 2003-2014 to build barracks of shoddy construction, contracting out the maintenance, then losing that maintenance contract when the war money ran out. So Marines wait for days for an FMD guy to fix a leaking pipe.

Like building barracks that are supposed to look like apartments so Marines will feel like adults, but the layout in fact isolates Marines from one another and is the enemy of cohesion and camaraderie.

To bookend that beginning: I was a Bn commander in 2016. The base announced it was moving to a centrally managed barracks, with consolidated check-in and a customer service help desk for maintenance issues. After some digging, I discovered it was the good idea of some Quantico civilians.

Shortly after this, the DC for I&L came to our base. At a commander's town hall, we told him that someone had come up with the idea to centralize and consolidate barracks management. We told him it was a horrible idea and would make unit ownership of problems, cohesion, and leadership a further challenge.

He explained that he had been briefed by his civilian planners on this initiative, and it had sounded like a good solution. He further apologized having not paid close enough attention...for getting sold a bill of goods and promised the commanders he would kill it immediately.

Thanks to him, that initiative was put down then...but it arises again.

What does this chain of bad decisions have in common?

There are two components. First is the outsourcing of our Corps to the "continuity" of the federal civilian workforce. Good ideas, dreamed up by federal government civilians, with motives of Retention, Cost Savings, and Messaging. No motives involving combat effectiveness or readiness are involved. The second component necessary for these ideas to gain traction is when our senior leaders abdicate their leadership role and permit their implementation. Our leaders, who should be vigilant guardians of readiness, are at the front door signing us up for Kirby vacuums and magazine subscriptions. And letting the hookers ransack the house.

Expand full comment
Don Whisnant's avatar

I saw photos of the facilities at Camp Pendleton that caused all the media attention. It is inexcusable for Marines to live in such squalor. I have become cautious about what I read in the media, but if any of the stories are true, the commanding officer and sergeant major should be relieved for a 'loss of confidence in their ability to lead.' Also, don’t hire civilians to manage living quarters for Marines; find some Marines with old-fashioned leadership skills. They still exist, don’t they?

I have been a Marine for 70 years and am worried that the Marines have lost their way. With stories like this and the Force 2030/Talent Management 2030 mess, I feel justified in my concerns.

Please help, General Smith."

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts