Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Douglas C Rapé's avatar

Imagine if the senior military leadership decided they needed to seize and hold Bandar Abbas or the Port of Aden. The Marine Corps could do neither. What if the leadership decided to place a potent combat Brigade into Lithuania in response to Russian threats? It could not do it. Imagine that Iceland requested a military force be stationed there to send a signal to Russia. What could the Marine Corps send? What exactly can today’s Marine Corps do?

The Corps gave itself a mission to sink ships with short range missiles in one specific geographic location and in that target fixation discarded its ability to be able to do what it is tasked by law to provide. This unilateral disobedience of the law most certainly should result in consequences for those who executed this rouge charge into irrelevance.

Expand full comment
Douglas C Rapé's avatar

Imagine this scenario. A Regimental commander orders a Bn to seize and hold a mountain pass and the Bn Commander issues orders to his companies to support his scheme of maneuver. One Company responds that they had expected to stay in a local village to defend it and had traded in the rifles, machine guns and mortars for shotguns better suited to this self assigned mission. The machine gunners and Mortar men have been sent to the rear. Nor do they have hand grenades and they plan to forage for food and water in the village. They believe the enemy is unaware they are in the village. The Company Gunny and two platoon leaders had reservations and were sent to the rear with the machine gunners and mortar men. The sitrep reveals that they have no shotgun ammunition. The shotguns have no ability to affix a bayonet. The Company Commander further reports that he has no cold weather gear as he was unfamiliar with the local climate and did not expect the arriving cold front.

How is this example different from what the Marine Corps has done over the last six years?

Expand full comment
17 more comments...

No posts